On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Enlightenment SVN <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > Log: > add -cleanvt > > > > Author: raster > Date: 2012-03-22 22:23:44 -0700 (Thu, 22 Mar 2012) > New Revision: 69575 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/69575 > > Modified: > trunk/exquisite/ChangeLog trunk/exquisite/src/bin/main.c > > Modified: trunk/exquisite/ChangeLog > =================================================================== > --- trunk/exquisite/ChangeLog 2012-03-23 03:46:36 UTC (rev 69574) > +++ trunk/exquisite/ChangeLog 2012-03-23 05:23:44 UTC (rev 69575) > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > +2012-02-10 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > + > + 1.0.0 release > + > +2012-03-23 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > + > + * add -cleanvt to enable clean "fade out" animation before giving > + up the VT.
IMO it's much better to tell X to run on the same VT (i.e. the first one), start X with "background none" and use the same background. Then you have a flicker free boot and user has the feeling that boot was much faster then it really was. Unrelated question about exquisite: why aren't you using an abstract socket to communicate with exquisite? "2. You need a /tmp directory for the UNIX socket that is used to talk to exquisite. The exquisite-write utility sends messages to exquisite via a UNIX domain socket created in /tmp. This needs to be writable for exquisite to start." This implies that you need to have /tmp mounted or a writable / early on boot sequence. If you use abstract sockets you can start exquisite earlier. With dietsplash I use this and run the run the splash even before handing off to the init process. Lucas De Marchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
