On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:24:28 +0200 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Oops, when we added EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_ARRAY, we should > > have added a EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_VAR_ARRAY version as > > well. > > > > If I remember, I did that. > > I am not sure we handle in eet code more than a VAR_ARRAY_STRING, but > I may be wrong. VAR_ARRAY handles sub types, but not basic types. ARRAY handles sub types, but not basic types. That's why BASIC_ARRAY was added, to be an array that handles basic types, but there was no addition of a VAR_ARRAY for basic types. > > Is it too late to add that API, or does it not count since it's a > > macro? > > If it's just a macro and all the code behind already work, then I am > fine. But I doubt it's the case. I wrote a macro after I sent that email, and It seems to be working fine. I'll test it more after I wake up. Time to sleep. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
