On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:37:38 +0900 Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyo...@gmail.com> said:
i dont think that will do it. i put in 2 commits (1 to evas, 1 to elm) that fix
this a different way, that works much more nicely :)
> Dear all,
>
> SeungGyun and I found infinite loop in _elm_win_obj_callback_del.
> It calls evas_object_del() to remove evas objects in evas.
> However sometimes, there're several objects (which its reference count
> is greater than 1) that aren't deleted.
>
> To fix that, I added two evas apis, and changed some logic in elm_win.c
>
> +EAPI Evas_Object *
> +evas_object_hier_above_get(const Evas_Object *obj);
> +EAPI Evas_Object *
> +evas_object_hier_below_get(const Evas_Object *obj);
>
> In evas, evas_object_{above,below}_get() are existed.
> But i'm not sure that.
> In object deletion, we need to consider smart parent relation?
> If it shouldn't be, i think my approach is right way.
> Otherwise, the two apis aren't needed to apply. then just replace to
> evas_object_{above,below}_get() in elm_win.c
>
> Most of analysis is done by SeungGyun Kim. And I coded to resolve it.
>
> Thanks.
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
