On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jihoon Kim <imfin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some events such as EVAS_CALLBACK_CANVAS_FOCUS_IN, OUT in > Evas_Callback_Type can be belong to Evas_Canvas_Events group, > Others such as EVAS_CALLBACK_MOUSE_IN, OUT can be belong to > Evas_Object_Group_Events. > > Evas_Callback_Type has object event and canvas event, so It's hard to > decide. > At this moment, I remove the ingroup until we conclude.
Given that the callbacks are not shared, I wonder why they went in the same enumeration. We could fix it by creating another enumeration, but we need to be careful and maintain the same numbers as they are now otherwise the ABI will be broken. IMO it would wise to do that. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
