On 04/04/12 18:00, Hyoyoung Chang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Tom Hacohen<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey, >> >> I think I've already asked those questions before, but the release is a >> good time to review them again and make sure we like everything. >> >> First and foremost, why do we have elm_list_go, or more correctly, why >> do we only have it in elm_list and not in genlist? if it's needed, it >> should be in both, if not, it should be removed from elm_list. What is >> it's purpose? > > It seems like to sacrifice convenience to get performance. > maybe we can remove elm_list_go() with some performance penalty. > >> >> Second question: Do we really need elm_list? I believe that with a good >> enough default genlist item and some macros/function wrappers, we can >> just ditch elm_list and have only elm_genlist... Why does it exist? >> >> I assume it's faster than elm_genlist, but is it really *that* faster? >> Or *that* useful? > > elm_list is quick and easy way to make simple list. > without genlist complex callbacks, and item classes. > IMHO, it's better to use elm_list at simple selection such as choosing > items in popup.
Can't we just add macros/functions that implement list over genlist? It's just like what I did with pager and naviframe. It's nice in my pov. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
