On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: > On 12/06/12 02:54, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Enlightenment SVN >> <no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: >>> >>> Log: >>> Edje load: Although we don't use them that much, we have refcounts in >>> evas. >>> >>> Don't assume an evas_object_del has to delete the object. >> >> Woot ? Why would the sub object of Edje object be refcounted ? Only >> Edje is alloed to play with them ! > > Nah, evas is also allowed to play with them... Also, the fix is more correct > anyway, code should express what we mean, without too much magic. :)
Why would he ? Seriously, nobody should refcount the child of Edje. If someone does that bad things are going to happen, like this child could be an external and trigger event in a dead parent for example. So refcounting the Edje object is fine, referencing its child is calling for wrong things to happen. -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
