On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:22:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <[email protected]> said:

> Hello.
> 
> On 06/14/2012 11:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:09:35 +0100 Stefan Schmidt<[email protected]>
> > said:
> >
> > that's ok. i think this is just expected to never fail as the tool is a
> > tool we made and ships with cpufreq. :) chance of failure is... basically
> > nil :)
> 
> Agreed. Still the check costs us nothing. :)

sure. it's not a problem to do it - it just never was an "issue". :)

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to