On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:22:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <[email protected]> said:
> Hello. > > On 06/14/2012 11:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:09:35 +0100 Stefan Schmidt<[email protected]> > > said: > > > > that's ok. i think this is just expected to never fail as the tool is a > > tool we made and ships with cpufreq. :) chance of failure is... basically > > nil :) > > Agreed. Still the check costs us nothing. :) sure. it's not a problem to do it - it just never was an "issue". :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
