Thanks for your response. now @since is there. and "why no get if there is set?".. i don't get this fully, um.. i can get the "textblock" for the ELM_ACCESS_TYPE with out patch. on this status it would be possible to set the ELM_ACCESS_TYPE to what widget wants. in this case it woks properly as "Widget Type, Text", but there is unnecessary access object. So setting access mode would be better than now. Thanks.
Sincerely Shinwoo Kim. 2012/6/30 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:06:27 +0900 Kim Shinwoo <kimcinoo....@gmail.com> > said: > > > Dear all, hello. > > > > in access mode, all text, textblock parts are ready to read. but this > would > > be not efficient way and in case of the widget which uses the elm_layout > > internally, access mode does not work properly. for example, the > elm_label > > should speak "Label(EM_ACCESS_TYPE), Some Text(ELM_ACCESS_INFO)" but the > > elm_label speaks "Textblock, Some Text" because the label uses layout > > internally. Moreover access mode will create access widget for the > > textblock in the label. So the layout should be registered, if necessary. > > The attached is for this. > > need @since in docs. :) and why no get if there is a set? :) > > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com > >
elm_layout.access.set.2nd.diff
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
