hey

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yop,
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> I plan to update mupdf from 0.9 to 1.0. So i'm writing the build
>> system for that version. As mupdf is not necessarly included in the
>> distros, I integrate the mupdf source in eyesight and I build it. I'm
>> now wondering if I should build a shared lib of mupdf and install it,
>> or if i should statically link mupdf against the pdf module of
>> eyesight. Basically:
>>
>> 1) integrate mupdf and its thirdparty package (which includes :
>> libjpeg, freetype, openjpeg, jbig2dec and zlib), i build them and I
>> statically link all that against the pdf module of eyesight
>> 2) or I ask the user to have libjpeg, freetype, openjpeg, jbig2dec and
>> zlib already installed, I build mupdf and I link mupdf statically
>> against the pdf module of eyesight
>> 3) or I ask the user to have libjpeg, freetype, openjpeg, jbig2dec and
>> zlib already installed, I build mupdf as a shared lib and the pdf
>> module will use the shared lib of mupdf.
>>
>> What is the best solution ?
>
> I think 2 will be better as it doesn't conflict at all with the
> distribution without getting insane and building 10 dependencies
> inside.

ok, so it seems that 2) is the best. faster compilation in addition.

Btw, i'll drop support of poppler, too much work. Mupdf is fast and
lean, it's C. If it's missing features, i'll ask the devs to add them.

Vincent

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to