On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:48:15PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > Hi all, > > We have released EFL 1.7 and terminology 0.1, but to reach a broader > audience we need binary packages! > > In order to keep quality and reduce overall pain, I'd try to coordinate > this in our mail list with the following ideas: > - don't create multiple PPA/OBS/overlays for the same distribution. > Cooperate with others that want to help > - those with official distro packager status could step in and help with > their knowledge and rules. Ultimately we want these packages to be used by > upstream of Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse, Arch and Gentoo. > - the EFL developers could review build flags (optimizations) and > compile options. This would ensure our packages are in good shape. > - everybody could help with QA and test to ensure they work as expected. > It would be nice to do some comparison such as benchmark expedite on the > same HW with different distros. > > I'd like to have an updated list of "official" (as per our standards, if > possible by distro as well) of EFL 1.7 and Terminology 0.1 packages. > > If you know of some distro people that would like to help but are not in > this list, please share with him. Phoronix and Lwn would BR useful as well.
Openembedded layer meta-efl layer ready :). I wait for python bindigs ready to send pull request for that.. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
