On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:40:00 +0000 (GMT) Rajeev Ranjan <rajee...@samsung.com> said:
gee... your description doesn't match what the code does at all, but i can see what you are trying to fix. you need to work on your logs/descriptions. :) i added changelog that's right given the code. i'll also backport this to the 1.7 branch. > Hi, > Please review the attached patch for fixing issue in API > elm_datetime_field_limit_set() for boundary values. It has been created by > Sumanth for datetime widget. > > [Issue Details]: > elm_datetime_field_limit_set() API is not working well for boundary values. > [ex: for date, we can't set max limit as 31 and for minute, we can't set 60 > etc.. > - it fails at boundary conditions of Min/Max limit for all datetime > fields.] > > [Root cause]: > Boundary condition checking has not been done in a proper way. > > [Change Description]: > Boundary checking condition is corrected and the min/max limit boundary > values are included as API input. > > Signed-Off-By: Sumanth Krishna (sumant...@samsung.com) > Signed-Off-By: Rajeev Ranjan (rajee...@samsung.com) > > Thank You. > Regards, > Rajeev -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
