On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:42:31 +0900 Kim Shinwoo <[email protected]> said:
> dear all, hello. > > the attachment has accessibility feature which is for the elm_calendar. and > moreover.. > it would be better to keep one more api for the access which name is > _elm_access_edje_object_part_object_unregister(); > in the case of calendar item, its text part could be set with empty value > in run time(dynamically), even though it had a value (1~31) previously. > so if there is an empty field(item), then previously registered item should > be unregistered. the api would be useful not only this case but also others. > then, please review the patch and give feedback. thanks. ummm..... are you sure on _elm_access_highlight_object_activate() ? your patch makes there be 2 of these funcs in elm_access.c ?the patch looks a tad broken to me? -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
