On 27/09/12 04:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:05:40 +0200 Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> said:
>
>> On 23/09/12 23:14, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> It sounds like an excuse to not do the right thing. The manual
>>> intervention should be very minimal and it shouldn't be a source of
>>> bugs... once it compiles, it should work as if the paths haven't
>>> changed.
>>
>> It's easier to mis-merge, and that's a source of bugs. Everything that
>> is not completely automatic is a potential source of bugs. The word
>> "should" is responsible for 87% of all software bugs, so I don't really
>> trust that.
>>
>> With that being said, I do trust you, and you said that svn-git-am can
>> handle it gracefully, lets just hope it does.
>>
>> I'm fine with waiting with applying the patches, but lets have a
>> schedule for that.
>>
>> What's the plan for this merge? When will I be able to merge stuff? And
>> btw, do we make sure history is correctly kept for source files? Cause
>> that can be crazily annoying.
>
> i've been thinking about this. here is my take: eo should merge into the efl
> tree. this means it first needs to go into existing efl trees. so for evas
> that means - put it in. for stuff beyond evas unless u are fast u may have to
> port your changes to the new efl tree no matter what. at LEAST this is easy if
> u take your patches and split them up PER file and then apply those diffs per
> file - u wont get any mismerge problems u wouldn't get anyway as a result of
> doing work offline for a long time. :)
>


We have everything ready, so you want us to shove everything in when we 
want? (starting with Evas and going on lib after lib).

--
Tom.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to