On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > I wonder why not a single daemon to manage the cache. And it is the single > point to inotify. > > Use DBus session and you get the single instance with automatic startup for > free. > > I know most people don't like DBus, but here it should do well. This daemon > is only emitting signals when cache change, eventually taking requests from > clients (? Not sure)
I agree that having one dbus daemon make sense. It could also do the cache rebuild in one place and notify user only when done. As efreet data are also quite big in memory, maybe this daemon could also share the data structure with shm and reduce our memory consumption at the same time... -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
