On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:00:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:21:15 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <[email protected]> said: > > > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:54:14 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz > > > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> said: > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler > > > > <[email protected]<javascript:;> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:18:41 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz > > > > > <[email protected] <javascript:;>> said: > > > > > > > > > > > ah, how quickly bets are made against me the instant I leave the > > > country. > > > > > > my league of admirers is always so reliable! > > > > > > > > > > > > distcheck is always run before a release. always. > > > > > > > > > > then how did it pass when the edje_cc in the 1.7 branch literally did > > > > > crash in > > > > > this scenario - it wasnt random. it literally was ALWAYS a strcmp > > > against > > > > > NULL... > > > > > > > > > > > I said previously that I run the stable branch at work; I'm not at > > > work. > > > > > > > > > > aaaah so you didn't distcheck this one against stable branch? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm on vacation, bedridden most of the time with the German Plague and a > > > > fever so high that the top of it can't be seen from the peak of Mt. > > > > Everest. Despite this, I managed to drag myself to my computer to try > > > > and > > > > do a release. > > > > > > > > I would appreciate greatly if people could stop being less negative and > > > > critical, and instead focus more on being both productive and > > > constructive. > > > > > > fair enough - i just never expected this should even get through if you > > > are > > > building/testing against 1.7 - since you are not right now that dos create > > > some > > > issues and changes expectations that you are testing against that. :) > > > > How about you, Raster? Are you able to test with 1.7.x? You've mentioned > > this edje_cc bug and the Evas leaks. Anything else that is know but pending > > to be debugged in EFL (leaks, crashes) or we can do a 1.7.2? > > i have everything from trunk at this stage. i dont have 1 machine - i have 7 > of > them. i would have to clear up and set up all of them to use and build form > branches, write some scripts etc. and i havent done that at this stage. the > leaks were in both trunk and branch. the edje_cc was a non-ported patch (and > we > wouldn't have found it if all of us used branches - so its GOOD some use 1.7, > some use trunk). > > i have 50 mails on e-devel that include patches, bugfixes nd issues etc. that > MAY apply to 1.7.x too - and i simply haven't had the time to review the, so > there may be pending things that need to go into a 1.7.2 > > here's a list of them from e-devel (subjects so u can search for them): > > Subject: [E-devel] elm flip (1.7.x) issue > Subject: [E-devel] Proxy Image > Subject: [E-devel] eina_share_common, eina_bench patches > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH][E] Unbreak getting Nth element from boxes. Fixed by zmike already. > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH][Ecore] Fixes for invalid memory read issues > discovered by cppcheck > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH][Ecore,Edje,E,E-Modules-Extra] Fix typos. All patches in this mail are in. -- Igor > Subject: [E-devel] Deprecated/missing function to get object item's view? > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] [EVAS] evas_object_key_grab add check for same > modifiers > Subject: [E-devel] E-devel] [PATCH] [ELEMENTARY] > elm_fileselector_entry_inwin_mode_set doc fix > Subject: Re: [E-devel] [Patch] [Elementary] [Entry] Clear selection when entry > loses focus > Subject: [E-devel] [Patch] [Elementary] Documentation update for gengrid > Subject: [E-devel] [Patch][edje] Prevent duplicated inherition of "after" > Subject: [E-devel] EVAS_CALLBACK_MOUSE_UP callback is not called. > Subject: Re: [E-devel] [Patch][Elementary]Genlist: Fix anchor item to prevent > scroller movement > Subject: [E-devel] [Edje/Ecore]SIGSEGV on BSD's > Subject: [E-devel] eina benchmark and eina_file patches > Subject: [E-devel] [patch][elementary][entry] Hide copy/paste menu if there is > no selection > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] Edje: invalidate double named group > Subject: [E-devel] 2 steps eina_share_common_del speed up > Subject: [E-devel] elm_flip unexpected behavior > > that's a quick browse through my backlog finding the ones that bring up > possible/probably bugs or have patches/fixes that need looking at. > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Carsten Haitzler > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:06:54 +0100 Vincent Torri < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > said: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:21:53 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > > > > > > > >> <[email protected]> said: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > This is bad. Either do 1.7.2 before next alpha, or at least > > > > > > > 1.7.2-alpha1 > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > We really want people to test with the exactly same > > > software. > > > > > > > That's the > > > > > > > > >> > way to avoid problems like this one, it should never ever > > > > > happened > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > > > >> > point! > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Wasn't discomfitor running from stable EFL to avoid these > > > > > issues? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> he's runing from the 1.7 branch - which is what will be > > > 1.7.2... > > > > > but > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> didnt have the fix until i added it today. the alpha shouldnt > > > have > > > > > > > passed > > > > > > > > >> "make > > > > > > > > >> distcheck". > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > running from the branch isn't enough. he must run from the > > > > > > > > > last > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > tarball to be sure he has exactly the same as other users. If > > > there > > > > > > > need to > > > > > > > > > be a fix in EFL before next alpha, he must firstly release new > > > EFL > > > > > > > snapshot > > > > > > > > > or release, then get E17 on top of that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is the only way to assure users will be able to compile. > > > I'm > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > picky here because we're at alpha4 already, very close to end > > > and > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > kind of things were not expected to happen. But you know, the > > > > > default > > > > > > > theme > > > > > > > > > is far from complete and thus the development may introduce > > > some > > > > > > > > > breakages... then I recommend you, the theme maker, to also > > > run the > > > > > > > same > > > > > > > > > setup. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as for make distcheck, I have no idea... likely he did not run > > > it? > > > > > How > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > the alpha release procedure going on? Just make distcheck and > > > it's > > > > > > > gold? > > > > > > > > > Asking more folks at #edevelop to give it a try to tarballs > > > before > > > > > > > doing > > > > > > > > > the announcement? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree. Especially for other distro like the BSD > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'll put money on the fact that no other distros or os's are > > > checked.. > > > > > and > > > > > > > given alpha4 came out.. make distcheck wasn't used as edje_cc wil > > > have > > > > > > > segv's > > > > > > > failing it. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
