On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:57:36PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it > > > cannot block development because features that is in the standard for > > > 12 years without being implemented. > > > > First of all, shm_open is an optional part of POSIX. One of the reasons > > for reluctantly implementing it is that it is extremely lame. The way > > Linux implements it provides ~0 advantage of just using open() with a > > file in /tmp. > > > > Not in our point of view. Anyway, you're free to add an eina wrapper that > does use a file in /tmp for BSD. We're not just doing that for Linux as > there is better way of doing it (that at guarantees it's never going to > disk).
But it doesn't even guarantee that. It can still be swapped out for example. Joerg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
