On 12/18/2012 03:22 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 18/12/12 12:41, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote: >> I removed this macro already and committed. >> Btw, DATA_GET was already defined ... just two lines after ;-) > But that still could deliver NULL so the part to check for NULL before > dereferencing it and crash is still needed, right? Just wondering. Yes, it can. Checking NULL is always needed but not always done, that is the problem. There are a lot of code in EFL that retrieves data and doesn't check nullity, even before Eo. > > regards > Stefan Schmidt > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial > Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support > Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services > Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
