On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:55:24 +0000 Christopher Michael <cpmicha...@comcast.net> said:
> Luis Felipe Strano Moraes <luis.str...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Raster already answered on the other thread, but copying it here for > >easy > >of reference: > > > >"designer/theme maker uses physics in a theme. edje loads it and goes > >"i > >cant do > >physics - ignore it", user then complains how the theme is broken and > >nothing > >works." > > > >--lf > > I see. Well that logic makes sense However, what happens when a user builds > efl themselves without physics ? or a distro makes packages with it > disabled ?? You still face the same problem good point... BUt they explicitly made a CHOICE to disable it. the ":i made no specific choices" path should be the path of least surprise. ie "well i just configured and installed and provided what it asked for.. and now its broken? wtf?". if there was an explicit choice made to disable some functionality/break something... then sure - the theme breaks in this case, but a CHOICE WAS MADE to break it. :) physic is is a feature that will probably get used more and more over time and doesnt depend on much beyond bullet and will be the same regardless of os/displaysystem/etc.. displaysystem on the other hand is a different matter. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
