On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < > barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >> On Saturday, January 12, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >> > I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and not >> > just a make thing? >> >> >> Because it is a library and must be detected otherwise the tests won't >> compile. >> >> > I know that. What I meant is: why is it not auto-detected and then just > works or doesn't when you "make check"? It's not like the auto detection > things that you only find out about in run-time, this will show up in > compile time and saves the need to fiddle with this useless option.
it's not an useless option. If you're a developer you must do the tests... at least that should be the point in having them. There should be no option, we still have "--with-tests", maybe one day that should go away and we always do them. I know right now half of our tests are broken, but we should fix that, not ignore them :-) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: barbi...@gmail.com Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
