On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote: >> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>>> >>>> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>>> >>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Tom, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen >>>> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey guys, >>>> >>>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git >>>> while keeping >>>> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, >>>> we'll share the >>>> results on Monday. >>>> >>>> >>>> How everything is going to work with git? Will we have just >>>> one git >>>> repository? Will people have commit access using a git >>>> shared >>>> repository? Or will we have an integrator? >>>> >>>> >>>> As I said at EFL Dev Day: if we keep cvs/svn work flow, GIT >>>> won't help >>>> >>>> >>>> As I said at the EFL Dev DAy: >>>> I think it will help. It's a better tool that permits people to >>>> do a >>>> better job in producing better commits (for example local commits) >>>> and thus better state of the repository. >>>> >>>> Also, that's just a first step towards working right. I don't we >>>> can >>>> just change everything in a bang. >>>> >>>> >>>> While I'll like it because of "git add -p" and local, many people >>>> already use GIT overlays and then svn-git-am.py to easily work. >>>> >>>> The problem is if people keep their bindings "save = commit && push" >>>> >>>> To tell you the truth even I just give a big fuck to doing better >>>> commits as most people don't. So others may be "inspired" as we'll and >>>> the situation degrades. >>> >>> I hope it'll improve. I really do believe people will start doing things >>> right once they see the benefits. :) >>> >>> -- >>> Tom. >>> >> >> Well, it may help if you define what you consider "right" and what these >> "benefits" may be ... > > Refer to past discussions for more on that.
Hmm, I do not recall seeing any past discussions about what You consider the "right" way But either way, that's a > future subject as it's not mandatory for the switch. Oh, I agree that it is not mandatory for someone to work in the "right" way in order to do the switch...However, after the switch is done and you are expecting people to change their work flow to the "right" way then you may want to define that way ;) dh > > -- > Tom. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
