On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christopher Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote: >>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>>> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen >>>>> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey guys, >>>>> >>>>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git >>>>> while keeping >>>>> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, >>>>> we'll share the >>>>> results on Monday. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How everything is going to work with git? Will we have just >>>>> one git >>>>> repository? Will people have commit access using a git >>>>> shared >>>>> repository? Or will we have an integrator? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As I said at EFL Dev Day: if we keep cvs/svn work flow, GIT >>>>> won't help >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As I said at the EFL Dev DAy: >>>>> I think it will help. It's a better tool that permits people to >>>>> do a >>>>> better job in producing better commits (for example local commits) >>>>> and thus better state of the repository. >>>>> >>>>> Also, that's just a first step towards working right. I don't we >>>>> can >>>>> just change everything in a bang. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> While I'll like it because of "git add -p" and local, many people >>>>> already use GIT overlays and then svn-git-am.py to easily work. >>>>> >>>>> The problem is if people keep their bindings "save = commit && push" >>>>> >>>>> To tell you the truth even I just give a big fuck to doing better >>>>> commits as most people don't. So others may be "inspired" as we'll and >>>>> the situation degrades. >>>> >>>> I hope it'll improve. I really do believe people will start doing things >>>> right once they see the benefits. :) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tom. >>>> >>> >>> Well, it may help if you define what you consider "right" and what these >>> "benefits" may be ... >> >> Refer to past discussions for more on that. > > Hmm, I do not recall seeing any past discussions about what You consider > the "right" way > > But either way, that's a >> future subject as it's not mandatory for the switch. > > Oh, I agree that it is not mandatory for someone to work in the "right" > way in order to do the switch...However, after the switch is done and > you are expecting people to change their work flow to the "right" way > then you may want to define that way ;)
I am really concerned how I will be able to break svn if we move to git. I don't see how I can do the "right" think there ! -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
