On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:05:24 +0000 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:53, Christopher Michael wrote: > > On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote: > >>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >>>> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Tom, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen > >>>>> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hey guys, > >>>>> > >>>>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating > >>>>> SVN to git > >>>>> while keeping > >>>>> complete history. We believe we got it > >>>>> figured out, we'll share the > >>>>> results on Monday. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> How everything is going to work with git? Will we > >>>>> have just > >>>>> one git > >>>>> repository? Will people have commit access using > >>>>> a git shared > >>>>> repository? Or will we have an integrator? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> As I said at EFL Dev Day: if we keep cvs/svn work > >>>>> flow, GIT won't help > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> As I said at the EFL Dev DAy: > >>>>> I think it will help. It's a better tool that permits > >>>>> people to do a > >>>>> better job in producing better commits (for example local > >>>>> commits) > >>>>> and thus better state of the repository. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, that's just a first step towards working right. I > >>>>> don't we can > >>>>> just change everything in a bang. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> While I'll like it because of "git add -p" and local, many > >>>>> people already use GIT overlays and then svn-git-am.py to > >>>>> easily work. > >>>>> > >>>>> The problem is if people keep their bindings "save = commit && > >>>>> push" > >>>>> > >>>>> To tell you the truth even I just give a big fuck to doing > >>>>> better commits as most people don't. So others may be > >>>>> "inspired" as we'll and the situation degrades. > >>>> > >>>> I hope it'll improve. I really do believe people will start doing > >>>> things > >>>> right once they see the benefits. :) > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Tom. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Well, it may help if you define what you consider "right" and > >>> what these "benefits" may be ... > >> > >> Refer to past discussions for more on that. > > > > Hmm, I do not recall seeing any past discussions about what You > > consider the "right" way > > > Old discussions. Anyhow, I'm trying to avoid stating this in this > thread for a reason. I really don't want to get off topic in this > thread. If you want I can tell you in person or you can just write > until we sketch something up about it in a couple of weeks time. > > Either way, you don't need to worry too much as whatever will go in > will go in after long discussions. I remember raster saying which is the general direction he wants to go, as such, that's as close to the "right way" as we got right now. We'll leave it up to Devilhorns to search his own mailing list archives for that. B-) Hint, the word "phabricator" might be unique enough to help with that search. The mailing list discussion where we decided that phabricator is the thing to try out is what you are looking for. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
