On 18/01/13 14:12, David Seikel wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:05:24 +0000 Tom Hacohen > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 18/01/13 13:53, Christopher Michael wrote: >>> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>>> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote: >>>>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>>>>> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen >>>>>>> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating >>>>>>> SVN to git >>>>>>> while keeping >>>>>>> complete history. We believe we got it >>>>>>> figured out, we'll share the >>>>>>> results on Monday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How everything is going to work with git? Will we >>>>>>> have just >>>>>>> one git >>>>>>> repository? Will people have commit access using >>>>>>> a git shared >>>>>>> repository? Or will we have an integrator? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I said at EFL Dev Day: if we keep cvs/svn work >>>>>>> flow, GIT won't help >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As I said at the EFL Dev DAy: >>>>>>> I think it will help. It's a better tool that permits >>>>>>> people to do a >>>>>>> better job in producing better commits (for example local >>>>>>> commits) >>>>>>> and thus better state of the repository. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, that's just a first step towards working right. I >>>>>>> don't we can >>>>>>> just change everything in a bang. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While I'll like it because of "git add -p" and local, many >>>>>>> people already use GIT overlays and then svn-git-am.py to >>>>>>> easily work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The problem is if people keep their bindings "save = commit && >>>>>>> push" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To tell you the truth even I just give a big fuck to doing >>>>>>> better commits as most people don't. So others may be >>>>>>> "inspired" as we'll and the situation degrades. >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope it'll improve. I really do believe people will start doing >>>>>> things >>>>>> right once they see the benefits. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tom. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, it may help if you define what you consider "right" and >>>>> what these "benefits" may be ... >>>> >>>> Refer to past discussions for more on that. >>> >>> Hmm, I do not recall seeing any past discussions about what You >>> consider the "right" way >> >> >> Old discussions. Anyhow, I'm trying to avoid stating this in this >> thread for a reason. I really don't want to get off topic in this >> thread. If you want I can tell you in person or you can just write >> until we sketch something up about it in a couple of weeks time. >> >> Either way, you don't need to worry too much as whatever will go in >> will go in after long discussions. > > I remember raster saying which is the general direction he wants to go, > as such, that's as close to the "right way" as we got right now. We'll > leave it up to Devilhorns to search his own mailing list archives for > that. B-) > > Hint, the word "phabricator" might be unique enough to help with that > search. The mailing list discussion where we decided that phabricator > is the thing to try out is what you are looking for. >
Thanks onefang !! :) Finally someone helpful and not sarcastic ! Cheers, dh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
