On 30/01/13 12:35, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2013 7:33 AM, "Tom Hacohen" <tom.haco...@samsung.com
> <mailto:tom.haco...@samsung.com>> wrote:
>  >
>  > On 30/01/13 01:00, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>  >>
>  >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Tom Hacohen <t...@stosb.com
> <mailto:t...@stosb.com>> wrote:
>  >>>
>  >>> Well, we aren't doing the switch yet. Probably early next week. But
> we are
>  >>> prepping the git repos now (it takes time, a few days of actually
>  >>> *running*).
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> sigh... days?  Are you running this remotely or on the same machine
> svn is in?
>  >>
>  >> Another thing to consider to fixup the authors is actually running
>  >> git-filter-branch after the repo is converted. It should be much
>  >> shorter than "days".
>  >
>  >
>  > git-filter-branch can be fast or slow, depending on what you do. We
> are working with a fast machine, doing everything on ram, and still it
> takes time. I exaggerated with the "days", it's actually only 2 days.
>  > We have to do a couple of things: Fix the authors, change the commit
> message (change the git-svn line), go through all the commits in the
> repo finding historic locations of repos and fixing up history to work
> nicely. It's computing time. It's not our fault. We were also surprised
> by the time it takes.
>  > Seriously, try this on your own and you'll see.
>
> Ok. 2 days... I was impressed by your "days" imagining 4 or 5 ;-)
>
>  >
>  >
>  >>
>  >> I'd also like to ask to convert the commits coming from svn-git-am.py
>  >> script so the author in "Patch-by:" in the commit message turns into a
>  >> real author in the new repository. I tried to check this looking at
>  >> edbus dir (since I proxied lots of patches there), but most of it had
>  >> barbieri as the author since he moved the repo -- I think this problem
>  >> has already been discussed  and solved.
>  >>
>  >
>  > We'll take a look at solving that. Very annoying that you guys did it
> like that, but OK. :)
>
> svn doesn't differentiate author and comitter. So I'd blame svn rather
> than us.

I'm blaming you because git-svn does it automatically when there's a 
"From:" line or a Signed-off-by line. :)

I'm not really blaming you, was just joking, but that's what I meant.

To be fair I blame SVN more than I blame you.

--
Tom.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to