On 29/01/13 08:49, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:16:33 +0900 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> said: > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Jérémy Zurcher <jer...@asynk.ch> wrote: >>> cgit.enlightenment.org is a really cheap and nice complementary tool to >>> have, usable by non-registred users too.
For the record, I agree with you here. Especially as long as none of the php experts on this ML adds public read-access to phabricator I think this would be a good alternative. That being said I won't argue the point (any more than you already did). So if consensus is to not have it - fine. In any case we can always add it really quick. >> Is it worth maintaining it ? That's our question, at the moment, it's >> a 3s and syntax coloration win from my point of view. Is that enough ? I would say yes, at the moment mainly because it provides access without being logged in. > i say that its not worth it imho... one reason for choosing phab is that > fact > that we can sanely maintain it if need be... it's in php. most devs know > php, > and if they don't.. they are not writing c :) cgit is written in...C ;-) Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
