On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:32:47 +0100 Bertrand Jacquin <be...@meleeweb.net> wrote:
> On 2013-01-30 21:57, David Seikel wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:01:20 +0000 Tom Hacohen > > <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: > > > >> On 30/01/13 11:32, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > For e5 buildbot/whatever we will need different OS and > >> architecture > >> > to test. So if some volunteer are free to build some, we can > >> gladly > >> > host them. > >> > > >> > Needed OS : > >> > > >> > - Windows XP x86 > >> > - Windows XP x86_64 > >> > - Windows Vista x86_64 > >> > - Windows 7 x86_64 > >> > - Windows 8 x86_64 > >> > > >> > (maybe more declination are needed ?) > >> > > >> > - Mac OS X Snow Leopard > >> > - Mac OS X Lion > >> > - Mac OS X Mountain Lion > >> > > >> > - FreeBSD 8 > >> > - FreeBSD 9 > >> > > >> > - NetBSD 4.0 (still supported) > >> > - NetBSD 6.0 (still supported) > >> > - NetBSD 6.0 > >> > > >> > - OpenBSD 5.2 > >> > > >> > - ?? Other, and maybe more declination on previous list > > > > Various versions of Linux as well, or did you leave them off coz you > > don't need any help setting them up? > > No, I just forget them. Yes, you need ARM, mips, mipsel, ppc, ppc64, > sparc ... > > >> You can't run Mac OS in a vm. > > > > It's possible, and it used to be legal, but Apple changed their > > license > > terms to make that illegal now. Now it's only legal to run Mac OSX > > on > > actual Apple branded hardware. Even if you own the Apple hardware, > > it's still illegal to run Mac OSX on a virtual machine on something > > else. > > Don't they apply a specific licensing for developers ? Not that I know of. I'll add it to me TODO to check on that, since I want to have a MAC OSX VM image myself for open source development. > > While on the subject, we got suitable licenses for the Windows vms? > > We don't currently have. > > >> I think it's too soon for this. We haven't really figured out our > >> whole CI process. Lets have those VMs when all of that is sorted. > > > > I agree here, especially with the talk of moving from buildbot to > > jenkins. Let that settle, as it might change the requirements. > > Well, that's not an immediate request. It's a long term build farm > design. > > > A very minimal default install of the OS, followed by a script that > > can > > install the rest of the build tools and build dependencies needed, > > is what I do. That makes things easy to reconstruct each OS later. > > It should even help when building variants for any specific OS if > > the script has a bit of flexibility. > > Also, we can easily do LVM snapshot the VM so we can rewind if > everything is br0ken. > > > A lot of people say "just use ssh" for connecting to the systems to > > automate the builds. Now I don't know what buildbot and jenkins > > use, so this part might not be needed to say. > > Builbot use a daemon on the slave host, master send order to the > slave to build that revision for that build chain. There is no use of > SSH, all transfers and orders are passed via a clear channel on a > specific TCP port. That's cool then. B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel