On 20/03/13 09:53, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 19/03/13 17:43, Daniel Willmann wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> as you know we have had Jenkins running and reporting build issues for >>> almost two weeks now. After initial hiccups I think it has performed >>> quite well so far. I know of only one occasion where Jenkins blamed the >>> wrong commit for failing (and that was only because the segfault didn't >>> happen every time the tests ran) and I think it is worth having the >>> Jenkins bot report failed and fixed builds. >>> >>> All was fine until earlier today when the Jenkins bot got kicked from >>> #edevelop for use of colors and excessive messaging. I disabled colors >>> and reduced the message to only report success of failure in order to >>> have the bot in the channel again. >>> >>> I do think, however, that the earlier options were useful and we should >>> re-enable them - thus this mail. >>> >>> What the bot actually printed was this: >>> >>> <efl-jenkins> Yippie, build fixed! >>> <efl-jenkins> Project efl build #116:FIXED in 14 min: >>> http://jenkins.enlightenment.org/job/efl/116/ >>> <efl-jenkins> * tom: Disable cow magic in dev profile, instead of a hack >>> in the source. >>> <efl-jenkins> * tom: Eina cow: Don't tests things that depend on magic >>> when it's off. >>> >>> When enabling colors the bot writes the status SUCCESS/FAILURE in >>> green/red. This allows me to quickly look for the latest status in the >>> backlog which I find quite useful. It will also highlight commit >>> messages containing the word "test" in magenta. >>> >>> The other option I disabled was to also include the changes that >>> contributed towards this status change (the last two messages). This has >>> the advantage of highlighting whoever broke the build (or fixed it) and >>> gives you a rough idea what could have broken it. >>> >>> So what do you think? Is this too much, does it bother you? Should we >>> re-enable the these features? >> >> Just realised I forgot to support you on the ML. I'm obviously in favour >> of this. I'll match everyone's votes, and add 3. >> >> -- >> Tom. > > > Regrettably, the MVA (Multiple Votes Association) has already denied your > membership application. Twice. Continuing to submit multiple votes as > though you were a member is an offense punishable by scorning. > > Your cooperation is appreciated, and your submitted vote count has been > corrected to 1.
Wait what?! I thought my second application is still being reviewed. This is an outrage. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
