On 3/20/13 7:32 AM, oeai wrote:
> On 20/03/13 16:04, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:48:25 +0000 Daniel Willmann <d.willm...@samsung.com>
>> said:
>>
>>> On 20/03/13 10:26, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>> On 20/03/13 10:20, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> It has been brought to my attention that the git mailing list is
>>>> laughably
>>>>> slow, requires manual moderation by our developers for mails to be sent,
>>>> is
>>>>> administrated by uncooperative/nonresponsive unknowns at SF, and thus is
>>>>> useless.
>>> Yeah, I mailed their contact address twice to try and figure out why
>>> these mails get held in the moderation queue...so far no answer. If
>>> anyone else has a better contact to the sf-gods I would be happy if you
>>> could establish contact.
>>>
>>>>> At what point do we begin looking for alternatives?
>>>> I don't remember the exact date, but that point is in the past.
>>> So we should start acting soon.
>> welll i'm beginning to think running our own lists may not be a bad idea. 
>> this
>> is the first time sf.net has ever mysteriously just filtered stuff for no
>> reason. but lack of response is not good.
>>
>> i didnt really want to start a whole new set of mailing list infra and all 
>> the
>> spam management etc. :( but if we have to...
>>
> well maybe it would be better to start a bugzilla in the way mailings lists?
> rename it a little or something...
> 

Bugzilla + Media Wiki + Mailman + FreeBSD is always a winning combination.

All very simple and stable.

:)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to