On 26/03/13 08:46, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 25/03/13 19:51, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> Hey, >> >> There wasn't any edbus release. It seems it was wrongly tagged as 1.7. >> Please remove the tag in >> http://git.enlightenment.org/legacy/edbus.git/ >> >> Also I think legacy/e_dbus should have its description like the other >> libraries or maybe "Legacy library e_dbus, replaced by edbus in >> core/efl" >> >> Tom/Daniel, why I am the author of most of that patches btw? Shouldn't >> the "Patch-by:" have been applied?
> Lazy Daniel is still asleep, but once he's up I'm sure he'll take a > look. He has done the e(_)dbus migration so I'll let him take a look. I may be late, but I'm not lazy. You should know the difference because you possess both attributes at times. :-) > As for the author issue: yes, it should have been good. I guess he > forgot to convert the patch_by authors. Again, he'll do it today. :) Done > Too bad we'd have to rewrite public repos, but I guess there's nothing > else we could do. Yeah :-( Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
