On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:59:30 +0100 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> said:
> On 10/04/13 11:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:48:53 +0100 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> > > said: > > > > in the rest of the code fs->current_size is the current active size for the > > font instance - since multiple instances share the same source outline. by > > setting it to 0 we are forcing an evaluation of font size by other font > > instances sharing the same source. the code does this in several placesto > > basically "flush the current size and re-eval". somwhere the font code gets > > this font size tracking wrong, so this seems a good enough solution to that > > problem. > > Yes, I understand the issue and I understand the solution, I'm just > wondering why is the font source is modified like that will still being > alive. Or in other words, why is the font size is marked as "done" in > the int free function instead of finding a more elegant solution. its unreffed - so it may still be alive and shared/used. do you have a more elegant solution at hand? -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
