On 30/04/13 18:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:15:05 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said:
>
>> Where did you get that on?
>> Anyhow, what do you think about changing it to unsigned wchar_t?
>
> on my pentium-m test machine... unicode val 0 was < 0 and thus walked below 
> the
> array. yes. literally a negative.  wouldnt that be wuchar_t or something? as
> wchar_t .. is a typedef... :)
>

Hm... Annoying. There's no wuchar_t though.

--
Tom.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to