On 16/06/13 18:17, Igor Murzov wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:29:50 +0100 > Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> So, following up on: https://phab.enlightenment.org/T159 >> I'm migrating E-MODULES-EXTRA to git. >> I'm going to create a repo per module. I'm just interested to know, >> which modules would you guys like to see migrated? > > I use comp-scale, everything-places, everything-websearch, eweather, > mpdule, net, news, places and photo modules. But I think you should > not ask questions like this, you should migrate all modules to git. > The work isn't manual, so what's the problem? If you believe some > of the modules are broken or not maintained, you can move them to > the "legacy" category.
I would love using this opportunity to remove any modules that should not be migrated, that are broken and just confuse users. Also, while it is indeed not a manual process, I do review the results and make sure they are correct, retain history correctly and etc., and that is manual work I would like to reduce. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
