On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said:
> Hey guys, > > The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to > improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone. > We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our > compromises and preferences to better suit our needs (followed by the > extensive trial period). We think we made things better and we'd like to > hear your thoughts and suggestions. > > The code resides in devs/tasn/eo2. The differences are not major oh.. in the efl BRANCH... not the devs/tasn/eo2 git repo! i was looking there. > usage-wise (i.e eo_do), but are major internally and class-creation-wise. > There's an example of the usage of the new API in the eo2test directory. > The existing code-base hasn't been changed to use the new API, so > there's not a lot to review. > Eo2 is not complete, we'd like to hear your thoughts before finishing > things. > > Major changes: > 1. No more va_args, good ol' normal functions instead. > 2. Functions are resolved in eo and then called directly, creating a > "flatter" backtrace. > 3. We can have return values (to some extent). > 4. Less boiler-plate. > 5. Looks like we'll be able to get rid of some code thanks to this change. > 6. Possibly (probably) faster on platforms that pass parameters in > registers. > 7. Easier to do breakpoint on a specific eo_do call, instead of an > implementation. > > What we'd still like to achieve: > 1. Being able to drop the IDs in favour for more "friendly" IDs. It'd be > best to find a way to use the function pointers (for example) as the > IDs, but the problem is, that because function pointers are more > "unknown" we can do less optimisations on them which we'd like to avoid. > 2. Reduce more boiler-plate. > > Haven't been implemented yet: eo_do_super (among many other things). > > Additional comments: > EO_FUNC - this one creates a function that resolves and returns the > appropriate function. The functions created using this macro should be > used instead of the current eo macros. This one can potentially be improved. > eo2_do_start/end are just the entry/exit hooks of eo2_do (ref/unref and > possibly other stuff in the future). > > Looking forward to hearing what you have to say. > > -- > Tom. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel