On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:40:36 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> <barbi...@gmail.com> said: >> >>> Raster, heads up here that you can use eldbus_proxy that will make your life >>> easier writing these things. >>> >>> For instance you can manage all the pending call lifetime to the object and >>> proxy, if you delete it (unref) it would do for all pending methods, signal >>> handlers, etc >>> >>> It may be new to you, but check the examples or my code to upower/systemd >>> uses it as well. >> >> i saw some of the proxy use - i wasn't sure why i needed it actually. i >> didn't >> use any pending handles so it turned out for that bit of code, it's not >> needed. > > if will save you replicating those helpers you did... you don't need > to do anything with the pending call.. but you can use it to > explicitly cancel one. If you delete the object (unref) it will cancel > all pending automatically. > > your code would reduce to get object, then proxy, then call stuff like > CanPowerOff, no need to create the wrappers yourself. That's why we > added the proxy, to automate these wrappers we were doing over and > over again.
Easier to change the code and show him than argumenting ;-) > > >> btw... i put this in e right now, BUT... i totally expect that ecore may get >> these features, so the code can be pasted in when we decie just how it will >> look like. i just wanted to do some work to support systemd etc. :) this was >> a >> simple/easy place/thing to do. :) > > some like inhibit suspend/power actions may be good, but I don't think > doing the suspend/reboot action (even if delegated) should come in > Ecore... after all there will be a single app doing that in most > cases, E itself. > > to block the suspend/power may be done by all apps, like during a > media playback or slideshow.. What's the point in adding those to ecore, wrapping the systemd functionality? Same question goes for the recently added events for sleep, hostname, etc... Why adding a wrapper instead of just let applications listen to the signals sent by systemd directly? Lucas De Marchi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
