Hello. On 09/05/2013 06:55 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:50:50 +0100 Stefan Schmidt > <s.schm...@samsung.com> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> On 09/03/2013 08:11 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> Coverity: >>> o EFL: Outstanding defects 452 (452) with a density of 0.85 (0.85). >>> 1 defects fixed since last build and 1 added. >>> o Elm: Outstanding defects 20 (20) with a density of 0.09 (0.09). 0 >>> defects fixed since last build and 0 added. >>> o E: Outstanding defects 40 (200) with a density of 0.15 (0.73). 161 >>> defects fixed since last build and 0 added. >>> >>> Obviously I don't believe the numbers for E. I will do another run >>> today for it. >> >> I triggered another build but the numbers also make no sense albeit >> difference. I would suggest we skip the numbers of this week and hope >> the best for next week. > > Which brings into question the accuracy of the other numbers. Though
They are very close or even the same to last week for efl and elementary. I have no reason to believe they are not accurate. In any case it is up to you what to believe and what not can't handle that for other people. :) regards Stefan Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
