On 09/09/13 14:01, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:58, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 13:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 09/09/13 13:48, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>>> On 09/09/13 13:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>>> On 09/09/13 13:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>>>>> On 09/09/13 12:26, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Michael
>>>>>>>> <cp.mich...@samsung.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the
>>>>>>> mailing
>>>>>>>>>>> list at the least before giving blanket commit access because a
>>>>>>> person's
>>>>>>>>>>> work fits our requirements or is something that is "needed".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't really want to get into a scenario where, as a
>>>>>>>>>>> community, we
>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>> people commit access because of who their employer is or what
>>>>>>>>>>> they're
>>>>>>>>>>> working on and not because they've proven that they can write
>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> fit into our workflow, and this seems to be where we've been
>>>>>>>>>>> heading
>>>>>>>>> lately.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing personal against this person in particular, but I've
>>>>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>> heard of
>>>>>>>>>>> them or seen any code/reviews/fixes/documentation in relation to
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> project by them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I completely agree, word to word.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Tom.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Double standards are fine. No worries. We can move the code to
>>>>>>>>> github
>>>>>>>>> and work from there. Not an issue.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well yeah I thought the same.
>>>>>>>> He is supposed to work on private and even invisible project and
>>>>>>>> its not
>>>>>>>> even related to the efl repos.
>>>>>>>> Then github must be the right place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't get me wrong. I know him in person. But he needs more time and
>>>>>>> effort
>>>>>>>> to get an access.
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On a semi-related topic: this project should not be private and
>>>>>>> invisible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Feel free. You are one of the few people who can actually do that. We
>>>>>> used it as a convenient place for collaboration before we could
>>>>>> make it
>>>>>> public. But if it moves somewhere else anyway it might be fine to just
>>>>>> delete it afterwards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I can technically do it. Last time I wanted I faced objections.
>>>>> Anyhow, let's wait to see exactly what happens with it's location and
>>>>> I'll act accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tom.
>>>>
>>>> Well, I can already tell you what will happen ... it will move to Git
>>>> Hub for now. The developer working on it needs the ability to make
>>>> changes to it ... so it has to go somewhere that he has push rights
>>>> on it.
>>>
>>> That's good. So please let me know when I can remove the private NSA
>>> copy from our servers.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tom.
>>>
>>
>> Any time you want to .. assuming you are not too busy :P
>>
>
> Let me rephrase: please let me know once you have it on github so I'll
> be able to remove it without risking losing the work that has been done.
>
> --
> Tom.
>

Just remove it. No point in having it up there if it cannot be modified 
anyway :) and I already have a local copy so.,....

dh


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to