Hello, Just skimming in that thread.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michaël Bouchaud <[email protected]> wrote: > As I'm the only one to work on this project, I don't see the benefit to > make atomic commits. I must say that I wont read that commit at it is way to big to digest and understand. If it had been smaller I would have spend the time to read some of them. The one that I am interested in. It would also help new comer understand what is going on and so you may on the long run get more help. Just saying that such commit are not inclusive and wont get you much help. It may be that at this point of your project you don't really want help, which could be the case and perfectly acceptable. Just wanted to clarify your intention and the expectation you could get from people around. In that case, I would second Stefan and think it would it then more relevant to have it in your dev directory. What do you think ? -- Cedric BAIL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
