On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:10:51 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <[email protected]>
said:

> Hello.
> 
> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 01:50, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> > Thanks for the stable branch maintenance.
> > 
> > Question. Until when are you going to support 1.8 stable release?
> 
> A really good question. :) I asked this myself several times now
> without having an good answer.
> 
> It boils down to how much time I have left for it. I'm doing the
> release stuff alone right now and with 1.10 starting to form as well
> as 1.9 needs attention 1.8 will most likely be less important for me.
> 
> I was hoping to do 1 or 2 more releases and maybe have 1.9.x in such a
> shape that people are willing to upgrade. Hard to say if that is
> realistic or not. We will have a 1.8 release this week. The next
> depends on how much things get backported not only to 1.9 but also
> 1.8.
> 
> Maybe I don't even have to decide myself because no new commits show
> up in the 1.8 branches. :)
> 
> If anyone wants to do long-term maintenance for 1.8 please let me
> know. I would happily hand it over to someone if they want to go with
> it for longer.
> 
> Same goes for 1.9 just contact me if you want to help out.

here's my take. you want maintenance of 1.8 beyond  1.9 release...  volunteer
and do it. i don't think it's stefan's or a core devs job to do that. we just
don't have the manpower for that kind of luxury.

you want continued maintenance then upgrade to 1.9. if you ARTIFICIALLY choose
to not upgrade because of some policy - then that is not our problem. upgrade
to get updates. we have a policy of not breaking api/abi so this should not be
a problem upgrading to 1.9 vs wanting a 1.8 bugfix (a bugfix is also as likely
to break api just the same - it's a BUG if we break it).

i think we should put this up on our wiki as a policy to point to as this q has
been asked several times so far and it's always been this policy to date.


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to