Hello.

On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 14:17, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 04/03/14 14:12, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 14:47, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 15:39, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Hello.
> >>>
> >>> It just happened. EFL 1.9 is Out.
> >>>
> >>> Time to look forward and decide on how we want to handle 1.10.
> >>>
> >>> 1.9 went well enough for me to not burn me out which means I would be
> >>> willing to do 1.10 as well. Given that nobody better suited stands up
> >>> for it or you guys decide that I did a bad job.
> >>>
> >>> For whomever will manage 1.10 I have a proposed schedule:
> >>>
> >>> === Schedule ===
> >>> 2014-02-25 EFL release 1.9 / Merge window for 1.10 opens
> >>> 2014-03-20 Notice about soon ending first merge window
> >>> 2014-03-24 First merge window is over.
> >>> * One week stabilization phase starts
> >>> 2014-03-31 Second merge window opens
> >>> 2014-04-24 Notice about soon ending second merge window
> >>> 2014-04-28 Second merge window is over.
> >>> * Only bug fixes from this point
> >>> * Alpha release tarball
> >>> * Three weeks stabilization phase starts
> >>> 2014-05-05 Beta1 release tarball
> >>> * Only critical fixes from this point
> >>> 2014-05-12 Beta2 release tarball
> >>> 2014-05-19 EFL 1.10 is Out
> >>>
> >>> Two things have changed to what we had with 1.9 before. The first
> >>> stabilization week was cut down to one week and this gained week was
> >>> added at the end. Some people, including me, have the feeling that it
> >>> would help us to iron out the bugs before the release.
> >>>
> >>> The second thign is that I'm hopefully clearer with the dates this
> >>> time. I heard people had trouble with them. :)
> >>
> >> I heard no complains so far. Going forward I consider the schedule
> >> final and will try to handle this release as good as I can.
> >
> > As requested I put up timers for the different "deadlines" in phab.
> >
> > Have a look an tell me if it is really clear this time:
> > https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/efl_and_elementary_1_10/
> >
> > The events are aligned. For example does the first stabilization phase
> > starts once the counter for the first merge is down to zero and it
> > ends once the counter for the beginning of the second merge window
> > starts.
> >
> > If it needs clarification please let me know.
> 
> 
> Looks good. I couldn't see any obvious mention of the git commit message 
> + @feature/@fix things.

Added s short section with a link.

regards
Stefan Schmidt

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. 
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to