On 31/03/14 13:06, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 20:35, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Stefan Schmidt
>> <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
>>> In 1.5h the first stabilization week is over which marks the end of
>>> the first cycle in 1.10.
>>>
>>> People suggested to release a technology preview tarball at this
>>> stage. I planned for it on 1.9 but did not do it in the end because I
>>> see so much changes coming in the second merge window which makes me
>>> wonder if such a tarball would show anything.
>>>
>>> Would you folks prefer to have one or not?
>>
>> I think it would be useful for packager especially now that we did
>> introduce eolian in the build process. This should help them get ready
>> and be sure that our tarball are ok for them when we do start the
>> final release cycle.
>
> Hmm, so it would be more an early tarball release instead of a real
> tech preview for users and developers. I wonder if packagers would
> really pick it up for early testing. Its 7 weeks before the final
> release not sure if they already think about packaging 1.10.
>
> We would need to make sure that such a package would really only be
> used for testing of the packaging itself and not going into any
> distribution channels.
>
> In the end we will only find out when going down this path I fear. I
> have the revs from the last commits before the second merge window
> opened and will tag it as well as creating tech preview tarballs later
> today or tomorrow.
>
> regards
> Stefan Schmidt
>

I think this is a waste of time because of what you said, it's 7 weeks 
away from the release. I believe it's better to just do an alpha before 
the final freeze, or a pre-alpha a week before that, and have this as 
the preview.

--
Tom.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to