On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Cedric BAIL <moa.blueb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 21, 2014 2:26 AM, "Carsten Haitzler" <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:25:54 -0300 Felipe Magno de Almeida >> <felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> said: >> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> >> > wrote: >> > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:02:37 -0300 Felipe Magno de Almeida >> > > <felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> said:
[snip] >> > I think it would make the port easier to mantain. It would give RAII, >> > STL-compatibility, easier callback support with lambda-support and a >> > value-based API. But that's just my opinion. >> >> elm web has a c api. will always have one. thus we then would have to > write a c+ >> + elm web by hand AND a c+eo one. no. use eo to write one and efl++ > exposes elm >> web. webkit api is internal then and thats how it should be. > > I think Felipe was referring to the internal of WebKit talking to efl which > is already in c++ and would likely benefit from using the c++ with no > penalty. Exactly. Sorry for not being clear. I didn't mean use EFL++ for the elm_web, but for the WebKit backend for EFL. There's no reason to use the C EFL API by C++ code, IMO. Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
