2014-08-28 16:12 GMT+01:00 Tom Hacohen <[email protected]>: > Hey guys, > > It's been ages since we last complained about the existence of > Eina_Bool. We all hate it and think it's useless. It's too long to type, > and redundant. "bool" has been available for ages now. Same goes for > "true" and "false". I think we should kill Eina_Bool and start using > those. It doesn't have to be a sed (though we could sed it out from all > of our sources), it can be gradual. > > If someone thinks there's a platform out there that doesn't have "bool", > we can just add a platform check and define it if missing. > > What do you think? >
Yup, agreed. We can always keep Eina_Bool compatibility wrapper, but for new code and internal EFL code, use stdbool.h and bool. > > -- > Tom. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > D5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
