On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 09:30:57 +0100 Daniel Kolesa <quake...@gmail.com> said:
> 2014-09-29 8:52 GMT+01:00 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr>: > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> > > wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:44:32 +0200 Cedric BAIL <cedric.b...@free.fr> > > said: > > >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Lucas De Marchi > > >> <lucas.de.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Em 28/09/2014 08:46, "Graham Gower" <graham.go...@gmail.com> > > escreveu: > > >> >> I've attempted to build using the easy_efl.sh script and received the > > >> >> build error referenced in the subject (full build log follows > > >> >> message). > > >> >> > > >> >> Is there a particular version of udev that is required now, but > > hasn't > > >> >> been put in the autoconf goo? I have udev 182 on a linux distro > > >> >> without systemd. > > >> > > > >> > From > > >> > > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/libudev/libudev.sym?id=946f1825751919a176cd0039002a514de0c9c70f > > >> > > > >> > libudev 199 > > >> > > >> Question as always how many distribution ship this library and how > > >> many don't. Should we make 199 mandatory or should we just disable the > > >> code that require 199 (I guess it is related to wayland). > > > > > > since systemd and udev merged... a lot seem to have stopped updating > > udev at > > > all and may b e on a multi-year-old udev (eg 2011). so our choices are > > to force > > > an upgrade or work on these distros, or we need a way to emulate this > > udev call > > > inside eeze iof udev is older. that means someone has to do the > > emulation code > > > work there. > > > > Do we really need to ? We could just disable Wayland support if udev > > is to old, as I think that is the only think that rely on it. The > > question is more what about other system than Linux. > > > > No eeze at all on non-Linux systems. The functionality is usually there but > has a different library that is API-incompatible... but Eeze being a very > thin wrapper == near impossible to port. I've always been saying that it's > a stupid idea to have a wrapper as thin as this, should've been a more > abstracted library. i agree there. it should be higher up the stack (abstracted) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
