Hi, Until there is a way to run individual test suites in place, people who want to run just a particular test suite or a test case can make use of Environmental variable CK_RUN_SUITE and CK_RUN_CASE. When this is set, only that suite/test case is run. http://check.sourceforge.net/doc/check_html/check_4.html#Selective-Running-o f-Tests
I am using this for some time and found it very useful. Thank-you, srihebbar > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Schmidt [mailto:ste...@osg.samsung.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 7:09 PM > To: Enlightenment developer list > Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 03/55: autotools: enable make > check per individual modules. > > Hello. > > On 07/05/15 10:06, kabeer khan wrote: > > cedric pushed a commit to branch master. > > > > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=35119e7bfdc7c13c204 > 1293f3d0b2ebe1fb7c313 > > > > commit 35119e7bfdc7c13c2041293f3d0b2ebe1fb7c313 > > Author: kabeer khan <kabeer.k...@samsung.com> > > Date: Wed Apr 15 16:58:11 2015 +0200 > > > > autotools: enable make check per individual modules. > > > > Currently make check runs tests of whole EFL.Enabled running > > of tests of individual modules by make check-<modulename> > > > > The idea of being able to just check specific areas of code you are > working on is nice. > > I have some problems with this implementation though. Some comments > below. > > Signed-off-by: kabeer khan <kabeer.k...@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <ced...@osg.samsung.com> > > --- > > Makefile.am | 69 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > src/Makefile_Ecore.am | 5 +++ > > src/Makefile_Ecore_Audio_Cxx.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Ecore_Con.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Ecore_Cxx.am | 12 +++++++ > > src/Makefile_Ector.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Edje.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Edje_Cxx.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eet.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eet_Cxx.am | 7 +++++ > > src/Makefile_Eeze.am | 7 +++++ > > src/Makefile_Efreet.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eina.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eina_Cxx.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eio.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eldbus.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eldbus_Cxx.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Emile.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eo.am | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > src/Makefile_Eolian.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Eolian_Cxx.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Evas.am | 6 ++++ > > src/Makefile_Evas_Cxx.am | 6 ++++ > > 23 files changed, 247 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am > > index a756511..4bc6def 100644 > > --- a/Makefile.am > > +++ b/Makefile.am > > @@ -432,6 +432,75 @@ endif > > if EFL_ENABLE_COVERAGE > > @$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) lcov-report > > endif > > + > > +check: override DISABLE_SUBTESTS = 1 > > +check: > > + ifeq($(DISABLE_SUBTESTS), 1) > > + make check-recursive > > + endif > > I stumbled over this when make check failed (jenkins as well as locally > for me). After make check is done I hit this: > > ========================================================== > ================== > Testsuite summary for efl 1.14.99.30492 > ========================================================== > ================== > # TOTAL: 31 > # PASS: 31 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > ========================================================== > ================== > Making check in data > make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. > Making check in doc > Making check in previews > CC preview_text_filter.o > CCLD preview_text_filter > Making check in po > ifeq(1, 1) > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `1,' > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: `ifeq(1, 1)' > Makefile:2951: recipe for target 'check' failed > make: *** [check] Error 1 > > To be honest I do not understand what this tries to do. Setting > DISABLE_SUBTESTS to 1 here will always have the condition being true, or > not? > > That means make check will be run twice. I just checked by removing the > if condition. > > > +check-eina: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eina > > +check-eina-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eina-cxx > > +check-ecore: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-ecore > > +check-ecore-audio-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-ecore-audio-cxx > > +check-ecore-con: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-ecore-con > > +check-ecore-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-ecore-cxx > > +check-ecore-cxx-compile: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-ecore-cxx-compile > > +check-ector: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-ector > > +check-edje: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-edje > > +check-edje-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-edje-cxx > > +check-eet: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eet > > +check-eet-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eet-cxx > > +check-eeze: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eeze > > +check-efreet: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-efreet > > +check-eio: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eio > > +check-eldbus: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eldbus > > +check-eldbus-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eldbus-cxx > > +check-emile: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-emile > > +check-eo: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo > > +check-eo-composite-object: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-composite-object > > +check-eo-constructors: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-constructors > > +check-eo-function-overrides: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-function-overrides > > +check-eo-interface: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-interface > > +check-eo-mixin: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-mixin > > +check-eo-text-access: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-text-access > > +check-eo-signals: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-signals > > +check-eo-children: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eo-children > > +check-eolian: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eolian > > +check-eolian-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-eolian-cxx > > +check-evas: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-evas > > +check-evas-cxx: > > + $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) -C src check-evas-cxx > > endif > > > This makes the whole approach quite inflexible. Tom brought this up in a > recent discussion. One have to add these extra check rules for all new > modules, etc. > > His proposal is to have one make rule that compiles all the tests and a > small shell script check.sh which can run the test suites more flexible > by figuring out things by the given parameters. E.g. > > make check-build #compile all test suites > > ./check.sh evas > ./check.sh evas textblock > ./check.sh eo composite > ... > > I would be ok with that. The only thing I do not want to loose is having > ALL test suites running with make check. This has to stay like we have > right now. > > For people that want to speed up their testing by using only subtests it > should not really matter if that is a make rule or shell script with params. > > Any opinions on this? > > regards > Stefan Schmidt > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications > Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights > Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
