Exactly! +1 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Tom Hacohen <t...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > On 23/07/15 07:02, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> Hello. >> >> On 23/07/15 05:57, Daniel Zaoui wrote: >>> Yo, >>> >>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:57:45 +0200 >>> Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> On 06/07/15 07:28, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 03:08:09 -0700 Avi Levin >>>>> <avi.le...@samsung.com> said: >>>>> >>>>> you know this breaks elm? this changes callbacks for focus/unfouce >>>>> from >>>>> >>>>> focus,in >>>>> focus,out >>>>> >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>> focused >>>>> unfocused >>>>> >>>>> i imagine you will find similar breaks elsewhere. this needs a fix. >>>>> it has already broken terminology. >>>>> >>>> Can someone confirm this is fixed? I did not see a fix but I had <600 >>>> mails from e-commit to catchup so I most likely missed it. >>> I fixed it two weeks ago (f7915a5e). >> >> Thanks for letting me know. :) > > I think this is a good example of why we should maybe start creating > tasks for everything in phab, so we can later reference the task id in > commits and keep track of things. > > -- > Tom. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
-- Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
