On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:07:50 +0000 Mike Blumenkrantz <[email protected]> said:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:58 PM Davide Andreoli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 2015-10-07 4:52 GMT+02:00 Jean-Philippe ANDRÉ <[email protected]>: > > > > > jpeg pushed a commit to branch master. > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=12f9fea2a4d4d641a09fd6563a83b925d62e4868 > > > > > > commit 12f9fea2a4d4d641a09fd6563a83b925d62e4868 > > > Author: Jean-Philippe Andre <[email protected]> > > > Date: Fri Oct 2 18:14:25 2015 +0900 > > > > > > EDC Doc: Some fixes > > > > > > We need to move this doc to the wiki and complete it :) > > > > > > > Moving the edcref to the wiki means that people cannot have it offline, and > > I'm quite sure no devs will update the wiki after a change in the code. > > So I'm quite against this idea > > > > While I am not disagreeing that edc documentation could use improvements, I > agree with keeping it in the source. We are not good at > maintaining/updating in-source documentation, but we are even worse at > anything not directly in the source tree. but then only "we" can edit docs. no one else can help or pitch in. the wiki allows for discussions and editing by a far wider audience. it also happens to be in git. :) -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
