On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:52:55 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<barbi...@gmail.com> said:

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 23:47:15 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > <barbi...@gmail.com> said:
> >> >> looks good?
> >> >
> >> > no. no idle die. see above. :) it's portable. it's simple. it works
> >> > everywhere until you have oddball smack/selinux etc. envs and then the
> >> > env can take care of it via launch or socket actvation. first make the
> >> > "works everywhere" version. :)
> >>
> >> it's almost done, the libproxy.so needs to fork-exec on errors... that's
> >> it.
> >
> > why does it need to forke+exec on error?
> 
> to spawn the daemon?
> 
> error here = connect error, if that fails, spawn a new daemon

oh the "connect to daemon failed" error. ok. i was thinking other errors like
"proxy lookup failed" or "dns lookup failed" or whatever. :)

-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to