On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Davide Andreoli <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm starting this new thread to further discuss promises, thus the tag > [YetAnotherPromiseThread] :)
[snip] > The topic here is: do we really want to allow instant resolution of > promises? > For "instant resolution" I mean a promise that will call the user callbacks > as soon as the callbacks are "connected", thus in the middle of the user > code. (we took as an example a cached promise value) I think the fulfillment must happen immediatelly and the user of the promise must be able to value_set/fail immediatelly. However, as raster has mentioned some place else, the callback call could be delayed to the next event loop idler or job, so the callback is not called directly from efl_promise_then. I'm not sure what cedric has implemented, but both cases are valid IMO. However, calling from the next event loop job/idler is a lot easier to reason about it, so I'm inclined to like it better. [snip] Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
