Great, thanks! On Mon, Oct 3, 2016, 5:25 PM Bertrand Jacquin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 01:37:13AM +0100, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:05:42PM -0400, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:42:25 +0100 > > > Bertrand Jacquin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:15:35PM -0400, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:38:43 +0100 > > > > > Bertrand Jacquin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not able to reproduce this. Can you provide me an URL ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 01:56:02PM +0000, Mike Blumenkrantz > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems that phab permissions for viewing patch submissions > still require > > > > > > > a login, even when set to 'public (no login required)'. Can > this be fixed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > example: > > > > > > > > > > https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4154 > > > > > > > > Ok, now I get it > > > > > > > > > it seems that any closed patch submission marked public is public > but any open one is never public > > > > > > > > I'm not able to see any closed submission with no autentication. > Would > > > > you give me an example that works for you ? > > > > > > > > > > D4000 works > > > > I open a bug upstream about this. > > Please note that this is fixed now. Diffusion repo has to have 'Public' > read permission. I changed permission on every existing repo. > > Cheers > > -- > Bertrand > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
