On 20/12/16 11:03, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Jean-Philippe André <j...@videolan.org> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 19 December 2016 at 21:10, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <barbi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In Efl.Net I've created couple of "constructors" functions to help the >>> user with common tasks, such as: >>> >> >> Hmm. Sorry to be pedantic, but you've created @class functions, not >> constructor functions. :) >> >> src/lib/ecore_con/efl_net_ip_address.eo: >>> >>> - create(port, address) >>> - create_sockaddr(sockaddr) >>> - parse(string) >>> - resolve(string, family, flags) (returns a promise) >>> >>> In many languages that's easy to use: >>> >>> efl.net.ip_address.create(1234, "127.0.0.1") >>> >>> But in C it's a bitch: >>> >>> efl_net_ip_address_create(EFL_NET_IP_ADDRESS_CLASS, 1234, "127.0.0.1"); >>> >> >> EO constructors would instead be used as follows: >> efl_add(EFL_NET_IP_ADDRESS_CLASS, NULL, efl_net_ip_address_set(1234, >> "127.0.0.1")); >> >> Not saying it looks any better, really. But that's what constructors are, >> in EO. > > argh... my bad with naming conventions, how should we call what I > meant? Creators? Factories? >
Factories most likely. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
